We Don't Ask for Trust.

We Provide Proof.

We Don't Ask for Trust.

We Provide Proof.

Due Diligence Accelerator Your 4-12 week due diligence workflow, pre-structured. Baseline validation, MRV calibration, legal enforcement, ownership tenure—documented, verified, accessible.

Due Diligence Accelerator Your 4-12 week due diligence workflow, pre-structured. Baseline validation, MRV calibration, legal enforcement, ownership tenure—documented, verified, accessible.

Validated Baseline - Third party audited

Calibrated Monitoring - LiDAR + field measurement

Legal Compliance - EU standard enforcement

Full Source Access - Raw data, original documents

Permanence Protection - 40 year commitment, buffer pool

  • Validated Baseline - Third party audited

    Calibrated Monitoring - LiDAR + field measurement

    Legal Compliance - EU standard enforcement

    Full Source Access - Raw data, original documents

    Permanence Protection - 40 year commitment, buffer pool

The Transparency Engine

The Transparency Engine

Most carbon projects ask you to trust a score.

Most carbon projects ask you to trust a score.

Most carbon projects ask you to trust a score.

We invite you to inspect the evidence.

We invite you to inspect the evidence.

We invite you to inspect the evidence.

Silvador does not abstract trust behind ratings or summaries. We open the project itself—its assumptions, data, legal footing, and monitoring—so buyers can independently verify what is being claimed.

Silvador does not abstract trust behind ratings or summaries. We open the project itself—its assumptions, data, legal footing, and monitoring—so buyers can independently verify what is being claimed.

The Black Box

HOW TRUST USUALLY BREAKS

Buried Assumptions

Baseline assumptions buried in annexes, impossible to trace end-to-end.

Narrative over Data

"Trust us" narratives without access to raw data or decision logic.

Generic Buffers

Generic risk buffers applied without reference to local law, forest practice, or ownership reality.

The Glass Box

HOW SILVADOR EARNS TRUST

Source-Linked Claims

Every claim is linked to a specific page, table, or dataset in the audit trail.

Structured for Review

Project data is structured explicitly for rating agency and buyer review, not post-hoc storytelling.

Legal Disclosures

Legal analyses disclosed for additionality, harvesting rights, and permanence—grounded in Romanian forest law.

Visible Monitoring

Monitoring, models, and assumptions are visible, so buyers can follow the carbon outcome from forest compartment to issued credit.

This is not transparency as a slogan.
It is transparecy as an operating system.

This is not transparency as a slogan.
It is transparecy as an operating system.

Silvador’s Positioning

Silvador’s Positioning

Trust in carbon markets should be earned through inspectable evidence,

not delegated to opaque sources.

Trust in carbon markets should be earned through inspectable evidence,

not delegated to opaque sources.

Buyers don’t need fewer documents. They need clear sightlines.

Buyers don’t need fewer documents. They need clear sightlines.

THE

THE

TRUST

TRUST

STACK

STACK

We layer independent assurance standards to ensure integrity at every level.

We layer independent assurance standards to ensure integrity at every level.

VCS Verified

Carbon Standard v4.7

VCS Verified

Carbon Standard v4.7

VCS Verified

Carbon Standard v4.7

Baseline, additionality, and carbon accounting audited by accredited third-party

Baseline, additionality, and carbon accounting audited by accredited third-party

Baseline, additionality, and carbon accounting audited by accredited third-party

SD VISta Validated

Social & Environmental

SD VISta Validated

Social & Environmental

SD VISta Validated

Social & Environmental

Environmental Community safeguards and biodiversity claims independently verified

Environmental Community safeguards and biodiversity claims independently verified

Environmental Community safeguards and biodiversity claims independently verified

FSC CERTIFIED

Sustainable Forest Management

FSC CERTIFIED

Sustainable Forest Management

FSC CERTIFIED

Sustainable Forest Management

Regulatory enforcement via digital tracking and mandatory forest management plans

Regulatory enforcement via digital tracking and mandatory forest management plans

Regulatory enforcement via digital tracking and mandatory forest management plans

Legal Compliance

Romanian Forestry Code

Legal Compliance

Romanian Forestry Code

Legal Compliance

Romanian Forestry Code

Regulatory enforcement via digital tracking and mandatory forest management plans

Regulatory enforcement via digital tracking and mandatory forest management plans

Regulatory enforcement via digital tracking and mandatory forest management plans

Evidence Explorer

Evidence Explorer

Evidence Explorer

Complete project documentation organized by the four pillars of carbon credit due diligence. Every claim is traceable to source files—no summaries, no interpretations, just verified evidence

Search…

4

Rating Categories

2

VVB Verifications

3

Ceritifications ( VCS + FSC + SD VISTA )

1

Additionality

Would this have happened without carbon finance ?

VVB VALIDATED

Financial Additionality

Investment Analysis for Additionality Assessment

30-year NPV comparison proving conservation is financially unviable without carbon revenue. Baseline (harvest) = €5.9M positive vs. project scenario = near zero. Sensitivity analysis confirms project never viable without VCU sales.

VT0001 Tool

XLSX

Baseline Selection

Choosing a Baseline Scenario

Systematic evaluation of alternative scenarios per VM0012. Documents why legal harvest under Romanian Forestry Code is the most plausible baseline—conservation is a voluntary deviation, not common practice.

Methodology

PDF

Legal Baseline

Forest Management Plans

Official amenajamente silvice showing legally mandated harvest quotas (APV) that would have occurred without the project. These FMPs establish the regulatory baseline—harvest is not optional, it's obligatory under Romanian law.

Legal Records

Folder

2

Carbon Accounting

Model choices, baseline assumptions, over-crediting risk

CONSERVATIVE BASELINE

Core Documentation

Project Reports

Project Description and Monitoring Reports (PD/MR) with complete VM0012 methodology application. Documents carbon pool selection, monitoring design, conservative exclusions (no soil carbon, no speculative pools).

PD/MR

Folder

Quantification

GHG Estimate

Complete emission reduction calculations using IPCC Tier 2 methodology. Conservative BEFs, Romanian species growth curves, mortality rates. Full uncertainty analysis with ±10.3% confidence interval at 90% level.

Calculator

XLS

Geospatial Data

Spatial

Complete geospatial evidence for carbon quantification: boundary shapefiles, monitoring plot coordinates, forest stratification maps, satellite imagery analysis, cadastral overlays. Verifies area claims and forest composition.

GIS Data

Folder

VVB Confirmation

Verification Validation Reports

Independent VVB audit confirming methodology compliance, biomass sampling accuracy, inventory calibration. 10 site visits, 136 monitoring plots verified, 7 findings closed. Confirms emission reduction accuracy.

VVB

Folder

3

Permanence

Will the carbon stay stored? Fire, pest, political, and reversal risks

LOW RISK

AFOLU Risk Tool

NonPermanence

Full AFOLU Risk Tool v4.0 assessment quantifying reversal risks: internal (project management), external (fire, pest, political), financial viability. Determines 10% buffer pool contribution for insurance against reversals.

VCS Risk Tool

Folder

Management Quality

FSC Documentation

FSC Forest Management certification proving management quality: 100% FSC-certified project area, access controls, patrols, cameras, locked gates. Illegal logging controls via SUMAL 2.0. Fire breaks, pest monitoring, HCV protection.

FSC

Folder

TENURE SECURITY

Deeds and Representations

Land deeds verified by National Cadastre Agency proving clear title with no disputes. 40-year project commitment with successor provisions. VVB confirmed ownership authenticity. Legal foundation for long-term carbon storage.

LEGAL RECORDS

Folder

4

Safeguards & Co-Benefits

Community impact, benefit - sharing, stakeholder engagement

SD VISTA CERTIFIED

Community Engagement

Stakeholder

Stakeholder consultation records, public comment periods, engagement documentation. No displacement, no loss of access, zero grievances filed. Public access maintained for non-commercial use. Firewood distribution ≥7 m³/year to local households.

Engagement

Folder

SDG Validation

Verification Validation Reports (SD VISta)

SD VISta certification verifying Sustainable Development Goal contributions: SDG 12.1 (sustainable management), SDG 13.0 (climate action), SDG 15.2 (forest protection). VVB confirmed "net positive well-being impacts.

SD VISta

Folder

1

Additionality

Would this have happened without carbon finance ?

VVB VALIDATED

Financial Additionality

Investment Analysis for Additionality Assessment

30-year NPV comparison proving conservation is financially unviable without carbon revenue. Baseline (harvest) = €5.9M positive vs. project scenario = near zero. Sensitivity analysis confirms project never viable without VCU sales.

VT0001 Tool

XLSX

Baseline Selection

Choosing a Baseline Scenario

Systematic evaluation of alternative scenarios per VM0012. Documents why legal harvest under Romanian Forestry Code is the most plausible baseline—conservation is a voluntary deviation, not common practice.

Methodology

PDF

Legal Baseline

Forest Management Plans

Official amenajamente silvice showing legally mandated harvest quotas (APV) that would have occurred without the project. These FMPs establish the regulatory baseline—harvest is not optional, it's obligatory under Romanian law.

Legal Records

Folder

2

Carbon Accounting

Model choices, baseline assumptions, over-crediting risk

CONSERVATIVE BASELINE

Core Documentation

Project Reports

Project Description and Monitoring Reports (PD/MR) with complete VM0012 methodology application. Documents carbon pool selection, monitoring design, conservative exclusions (no soil carbon, no speculative pools).

PD/MR

Folder

Quantification

GHG Estimate

Complete emission reduction calculations using IPCC Tier 2 methodology. Conservative BEFs, Romanian species growth curves, mortality rates. Full uncertainty analysis with ±10.3% confidence interval at 90% level.

Calculator

XLS

Geospatial Data

Spatial

Complete geospatial evidence for carbon quantification: boundary shapefiles, monitoring plot coordinates, forest stratification maps, satellite imagery analysis, cadastral overlays. Verifies area claims and forest composition.

GIS Data

Folder

VVB Confirmation

Verification Validation Reports

Independent VVB audit confirming methodology compliance, biomass sampling accuracy, inventory calibration. 10 site visits, 136 monitoring plots verified, 7 findings closed. Confirms emission reduction accuracy.

VVB

Folder

3

Permanence

Will the carbon stay stored? Fire, pest, political, and reversal risks

LOW RISK

AFOLU Risk Tool

NonPermanence

Full AFOLU Risk Tool v4.0 assessment quantifying reversal risks: internal (project management), external (fire, pest, political), financial viability. Determines 10% buffer pool contribution for insurance against reversals.

VCS Risk Tool

Folder

Management Quality

FSC Documentation

FSC Forest Management certification proving management quality: 100% FSC-certified project area, access controls, patrols, cameras, locked gates. Illegal logging controls via SUMAL 2.0. Fire breaks, pest monitoring, HCV protection.

FSC

Folder

TENURE SECURITY

Deeds and Representations

Land deeds verified by National Cadastre Agency proving clear title with no disputes. 40-year project commitment with successor provisions. VVB confirmed ownership authenticity. Legal foundation for long-term carbon storage.

LEGAL RECORDS

Folder

4

Safeguards & Co-Benefits

Community impact, benefit - sharing, stakeholder engagement

SD VISTA CERTIFIED

Community Engagement

Stakeholder

Stakeholder consultation records, public comment periods, engagement documentation. No displacement, no loss of access, zero grievances filed. Public access maintained for non-commercial use. Firewood distribution ≥7 m³/year to local households.

Engagement

Folder

SDG Validation

Verification Validation Reports (SD VISta)

SD VISta certification verifying Sustainable Development Goal contributions: SDG 12.1 (sustainable management), SDG 13.0 (climate action), SDG 15.2 (forest protection). VVB confirmed "net positive well-being impacts.

SD VISta

Folder

1

Additionality

Would this have happened without carbon finance ?

Financial Additionality

Investment Analysis for Additionality Assessment

30-year NPV comparison proving conservation is financially unviable without carbon revenue. Baseline (harvest) = €5.9M positive vs. project scenario = near zero. Sensitivity analysis confirms project never viable without VCU sales.

VT0001 Tool

XLSX

Baseline Selection

Choosing a Baseline Scenario

Systematic evaluation of alternative scenarios per VM0012. Documents why legal harvest under Romanian Forestry Code is the most plausible baseline—conservation is a voluntary deviation, not common practice.

Methodology

PDF

Legal Baseline

Forest Management Plans

Official amenajamente silvice showing legally mandated harvest quotas (APV) that would have occurred without the project. These FMPs establish the regulatory baseline—harvest is not optional, it's obligatory under Romanian law.

Legal Records

Folder

2

Carbon Accounting

Model choices, baseline assumptions, over-crediting risk

Core Documentation

Project Reports

Project Description and Monitoring Reports (PD/MR) with complete VM0012 methodology application. Documents carbon pool selection, monitoring design, conservative exclusions (no soil carbon, no speculative pools).

PD/MR

Folder

Quantification

GHG Estimate

Complete emission reduction calculations using IPCC Tier 2 methodology. Conservative BEFs, Romanian species growth curves, mortality rates. Full uncertainty analysis with ±10.3% confidence interval at 90% level.

Calculator

XLS

Geospatial Data

Spatial

Complete geospatial evidence for carbon quantification: boundary shapefiles, monitoring plot coordinates, forest stratification maps, satellite imagery analysis, cadastral overlays. Verifies area claims and forest composition.

GIS Data

Folder

VVB Confirmation

Verification Validation Reports

Independent VVB audit confirming methodology compliance, biomass sampling accuracy, inventory calibration. 10 site visits, 136 monitoring plots verified, 7 findings closed. Confirms emission reduction accuracy.

VVB

Folder

3

Permanence

Will the carbon stay stored? Fire, pest, political, and reversal risks

AFOLU Risk Tool

NonPermanence

Full AFOLU Risk Tool v4.0 assessment quantifying reversal risks: internal (project management), external (fire, pest, political), financial viability. Determines 10% buffer pool contribution for insurance against reversals.

VCS Risk Tool

Folder

Management Quality

FSC Documentation

FSC Forest Management certification proving management quality: 100% FSC-certified project area, access controls, patrols, cameras, locked gates. Illegal logging controls via SUMAL 2.0. Fire breaks, pest monitoring, HCV protection.

FSC

Folder

TENURE SECURITY

Deeds and Representations

Land deeds verified by National Cadastre Agency proving clear title with no disputes. 40-year project commitment with successor provisions. VVB confirmed ownership authenticity. Legal foundation for long-term carbon storage.

LEGAL RECORDS

Folder

4

Safeguards & Co-Benefits

Community impact, benefit - sharing, stakeholder engagement

Community Engagement

Stakeholder

Stakeholder consultation records, public comment periods, engagement documentation. No displacement, no loss of access, zero grievances filed. Public access maintained for non-commercial use. Firewood distribution ≥7 m³/year to local households.

Engagement

Folder

SDG Validation

Verification Validation Reports (SD VISta)

SD VISta certification verifying Sustainable Development Goal contributions: SDG 12.1 (sustainable management), SDG 13.0 (climate action), SDG 15.2 (forest protection). VVB confirmed "net positive well-being impacts.

SD VISta

Folder

INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED

Auditors physically visited this forest 10 times and re-measured 18 sample locations with their own equipment. The numbers checked out. Every point on this map is real, verified, and downloadable.

136

PERMANENT PLOTS

1 plot per 17 ha—exceeds VCS sampling requirements

1 plot per 17 ha—exceeds VCS sampling requirements

18

PLOTS RE-MEASURED

Independent VVB verification of DBH, height, species

Satellite, Terrain, Dark mode

2029

NEXT VERIFICATION

5-year re-measurement cycle ensures ongoing accuracy

Load custom boundary files

±10.3%

UNCERTAINTY

Conservative deduction applied per VM0012

Click to copy precise location

Download Spatial Datasets

Download Spatial Datasets

Don't take our word for it. Load these into your own GIS software and verify boundaries, plot locations, and forest structure independently.

Project Boundary

Project Boundary

The exact 2,320 hectares generating carbon credits. These coordinates are legally registered and verified by independent auditors—what you see is what you're buying.

The exact 2,320 hectares generating carbon credits. These coordinates are legally registered and verified by independent auditors—what you see is what you're buying.

Forest Analysis Units

Forest Analysis Units

The project is divided into 30 distinct zones based on tree species, age, and terrain. This ensures carbon measurements represent the entire forest, not just the best parts.

The project is divided into 30 distinct zones based on tree species, age, and terrain. This ensures carbon measurements represent the entire forest, not just the best parts.

Monitoring Plots Locations

Monitoring Plots Locations

36 permanent measurement points, randomly placed and physically marked with steel stakes. Auditors can return to the exact same spots every 5 years to verify growth claims.

36 permanent measurement points, randomly placed and physically marked with steel stakes. Auditors can return to the exact same spots every 5 years to verify growth claims.

LIDAR Ground Data

LIDAR Ground Data

3D laser scans from two sources: professional-grade ZEB-GeoSLAM scanners and Arboreal (an iPhone LIDAR app). Both are cross-checked against manual measurements with traditional forestry tools. Three methods, one answer.

3D laser scans from two sources: professional-grade ZEB-GeoSLAM scanners and Arboreal (an iPhone LIDAR app). Both are cross-checked against manual measurements with traditional forestry tools. Three methods, one answer.

HOW WE MONITOR THE FOREST

Verified tonnes mean nothing if the forest is gone. Here's how we track the project area from day one through every verification—and how you can check our work.

Monitoring Plot Locations

No cherry-picking

Plots are randomly placed across all 30 forest zones with minimum spacing rules. We can't choose where to measure.

No cherry-picking

Plots are randomly placed across all 30 forest zones with minimum spacing rules. We can't choose where to measure.

Meaningful change detection

We flag forest loss greater than 0.5 hectares—large enough to matter, small enough to catch early.

Meaningful change detection

We flag forest loss greater than 0.5 hectares—large enough to matter, small enough to catch early.

Eligibility verification

Climate and ecosystem overlays confirm the land qualifies under VCS program rules.

Eligibility verification

Climate and ecosystem overlays confirm the land qualifies under VCS program rules.

STEP 1 - DEFINE WHAT COUNTS

Project boundary + forest zones

We publish the exact project boundary and the 30 forest zones used in calculations—so anyone can trace where accounting applies and verify we're measuring the whole area, not just the best parts.

Downloadable GIS: Full project boundary (SHP/KML) with parcel-level detail

STEP 2 - MEASURE REALITY

LiDAR Survey Data

D laser scans from two sources: professional-grade ZEB-GeoSLAM scanners and Arboreal (an iPhone LiDAR app). Both are cross-checked against manual measurements with traditional forestry tools. Three methods, one answer.

EPIC VVB Finding: Three-method calibration verified

STEP 3 - WATCH THE FOREST CONTINUOUSLY

Permanent plots → inventory

136 permanent plots installed across all forest zones, measured and re-measured every 5 years. This is the field evidence that checks whether our models match reality.

EPIC VVB Finding: 136 plots independently validated against NFI standards

STEP 4 - DEFINE WHAT COUNTS

Satellite change detection

Satellite imagery scans the entire project area every few weeks. If forest cover drops by more than 0.5 hectares anywhere, we investigate. For 2020–2024: zero significant loss events detected.

Geospatial Evidence: Zero loss events >0.5ha confirmed 2020–2024

STEP 5 - VERIFICATION

UPDATE EVERY VERIFICATION

Every verification period starts fresh: we check for boundary changes, update the inventory with new measurements, and recalculate using the latest imagery and LiDAR. The numbers always reflect current reality.

EPIC VVB Finding: Full inventory recalculation confirmed each period

NOTHING TO HIDE

Every boundary, every plot location, every measurement zone—downloadable and auditable. Run your own checks, or have your team do it. The data is yours.

THE DOCUMENTS THAT MATTER

CORE DOCUMENTS

CORE DOCUMENTS

CORE DOCUMENTS

Five files covering additionality, carbon accounting, permanence, and safeguards. Start with the VVB Report—it's the independent auditor's verdict on everything else.

Search…

MRV

START HERE

THE AUDITOR'S VERDICT. Independent Validation & Verification Report (VVB)

Independent auditor • 10 site visits • 7 findings raised, all resolved

Why this matters: The auditor's verdict. VVB physically visited the forest, re-measured our plots with their own equipment, and checked every calculation. If you only read one document, read this one. What to look for: How the auditor verified tree measurements (Section 2.4), whether they found errors in our carbon model (Appendix A—7 findings, all closed), and their final conclusion on methodology compliance (Section 5).

MRV

METHODOLOGY

HOW WE COUNT. Project Description & Monitoring Report v1.8

Complete methodology • Baseline logic • Carbon quantification

Why this matters: The full technical specification. Every assumption, every equation, every data source is documented here. This is how we calculate each tonne. What to look for: How we determined the baseline harvest scenario (Section 3), why the project wouldn't happen without carbon finance (Section 4—investment analysis), carbon stock calculations (Section 5), and the monitoring plan (Section 6).

Period: Aug 2020 – Dec 2022

Net Stocks: 62,040 tCO₂e

Buffer: 6,824 VCUs

MRV

BUFFER POOL

WHY IT STAYS. Non-Permanence Risk Report

AFOLU Risk Tool v4.0 • Buffer pool calculation

Why this matters: Determines how many tonnes go into the buffer pool as insurance against reversals. Lower risk = more credits issued. Our 11% rating reflects strong project management and low natural risk. What to look for: Internal risk scoring (project management, financial viability, longevity), external risk (land tenure, political stability), and natural risk (fire, pest, weather). Each category adds points that determine the final buffer percentage.

Risk Rating: 11%

Internal: 10 pts

Natural: 1 pt

MRV

SAFEGUARDS

NO HARM DONE. SD VISta Validation Report (VVB)

Social & environmental co-benefits • SDG contributions verified

Why this matters: Independent proof that the project benefits local communities, not just carbon accounting. EPIC verified stakeholder engagement, confirmed no negative impacts, and validated SDG contributions. What to look for: Stakeholder engagement findings (Section 3.3), community impact assessment (Section 4), environmental co-benefits (Section 5), and the list of SDGs the project contributes to: SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption), SDG 13 (Climate Action), SDG 15 (Life on Land).

SDGs Validated: 12, 13, 15

Grievances Filed: 0

Findings: All resolved

MRV

SURVEILLANCE

ANNUAL AUDIT. FSC Forest Management Audits

Annual surveillance • Forest management certification

Why this matters: FSC certification means a separate auditor checks forest management quality every year. This covers worker rights, community relations, biodiversity protection, and illegal logging controls—all factors that reduce permanence risk. What to look for: Principle 4 (community relations), Principle 6 (environmental impact), Principle 9 (high conservation values), and any Corrective Action Requests (CARs). Current status: >62% of project area FSC-certified, no major non-conformances.

Certified Area: >62%

Major CARs: 0

Audit Cycle: Annual

IFM RATING

IFM RATING

CROSSWALK

CROSSWALK

We’ve pre-mapped our data to the Core Carbon Principles (CCPs) and common Rating Agency risk factors. Don't hunt for answers—find the logic here.

We’ve pre-mapped our data to the Core Carbon Principles (CCPs) and common Rating Agency risk factors. Don't hunt for answers—find the logic here.

Baseline: Over-Crediting Risk

ICVCM CCP 1 • ROBUST QUANTIFICATION

Can the baseline be inflated? Three structural constraints prevent this:

Legal Cap — Harvest quotas fixed by 10-year Forest Management Plans under Romanian Forestry Code, enforced via SUMAL 2.0 digital tracking

Historical Anchor — 5+ years of verified harvest records (2012–2020) establish actual pre-project practice, not theoretical maximums

Model Calibration — CBM-CFS3 projections ground-truthed against 31 field plots; total uncertainty factor of 1.5% applied as credit deduction

Additionality: Financial & Legal

ICVCM CCP 2 • ADDITIONALITY

Would this conservation happen without carbon finance? No—and here's the verified proof:

Financial Test - 30-year NPV analysis: Baseline (harvesting) = €5.9M positive vs. Project (conservation) = -€252K. Conservation is financially unviable without VCU revenue.

Regulatory Surplus - Romanian Forestry Code (Law 46/2008) mandates harvesting under approved FMPs, not conservation. Ceasing harvest for 30 years goes far beyond legal requirements.

Common Practice - Only 2 IFM-LtPF projects exist in Romania. Private forest conservation without philanthropy or grants is effectively non-existent.

Leakage & Market Shifting

RATING AGENCY 'LEAKAGE BELT' CRITERIA

Could avoided harvest simply shift elsewhere, negating the climate benefit? Two structural controls prevent this:

Activity Shifting Blocked - Romanian Forestry Code (Law 46/2008) makes harvest quotas non-transferrable between properties. Silvador cannot legally compensate for reduced harvest in the project area by increasing extraction elsewhere.

Market Leakage Quantified - MARketz Tool analysis across 7 market factors yields 10% deduction, applied to all credits issued. Project represents only 0.1% of national timber supply.

Ongoing Monitoring - Annual verification of harvest volumes on Silvador's other 1,865 ha confirms no displacement. Market leakage recalculated at each verification.

Permanence & Buffer Pools

ICVCM CCP 3 • PERMANENCE

What if the carbon is released back to the atmosphere? A transparent risk assessment and mandatory buffer pool protect buyers:

Risk Quantified - AFOLU Non-Permanence Risk Tool v4.0 yields 11% total risk score: Internal 10 + External 0 + Natural 1. This percentage of all credits goes to Verra's global buffer pool.

Natural Risks Low — Romania's fire return interval is 200-300 years (only 0.042% of forests affected annually). Deciduous-dominated stands reduce pest vulnerability.

Clear Ownership - 100% freehold title held by Silvador Company SRL and Forest Capital SRL. Zero tenure disputes. Romania governance score: 0.24 (World Bank stable).

Double Counting Prevention

ICVCM CCP 6 • DOUBLE COUNTING

Could these carbon credits be counted twice? Multiple registry and disclosure controls prevent this:

Registry Exclusivity — Project registered solely under Verra VCS (ID 4511). VVB verified no registration with Gold Standard, Plan Vivo, ICR, or any other GHG program. Declaration letter on file.

Scope 3 Disclosure — Written notification sent to all timber buyers (6 companies) disclosing carbon claims. Public statement on Silvador website prevents downstream double-claiming.

No Stacking - Project has not received renewable energy certificates, EU ETS allowances, or any other form of GHG-related credit. Zero overlap with compliance markets.

Safeguards & Community

ICVCM CCP 4 • SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Does this project harm local communities or the environment? Three layers of independent verification confirm net positive impacts:

SD VISta Certified - Verra's Sustainable Development Verified Impact Standard confirms contributions to SDG 12 (Responsible Production), SDG 13 (Climate Action), and SDG 15 (Life on Land). Zero negative impacts identified

Stakeholder Engagement - 6 town hall meetings held (Nov 2022, Jan 2024), ~40 stakeholders consulted including local councils, forest workers, hunting associations, and NGOs. Zero grievances filed.

FSC Safeguards - 62% of project area FSC-certified (100% target). Principle 4 requires community benefits, worker rights, and conflict resolution mechanisms.

Baseline: Over-Crediting Risk

ICVCM CCP 1 • ROBUST QUANTIFICATION

Can the baseline be inflated? Three structural constraints prevent this:

Legal Cap — Harvest quotas fixed by 10-year Forest Management Plans under Romanian Forestry Code, enforced via SUMAL 2.0 digital tracking

Historical Anchor — 5+ years of verified harvest records (2012–2020) establish actual pre-project practice, not theoretical maximums

Model Calibration — CBM-CFS3 projections ground-truthed against 31 field plots; total uncertainty factor of 1.5% applied as credit deduction

Additionality: Financial & Legal

ICVCM CCP 2 • ADDITIONALITY

Would this conservation happen without carbon finance? No—and here's the verified proof:

Financial Test - 30-year NPV analysis: Baseline (harvesting) = €5.9M positive vs. Project (conservation) = -€252K. Conservation is financially unviable without VCU revenue.

Regulatory Surplus - Romanian Forestry Code (Law 46/2008) mandates harvesting under approved FMPs, not conservation. Ceasing harvest for 30 years goes far beyond legal requirements.

Common Practice - Only 2 IFM-LtPF projects exist in Romania. Private forest conservation without philanthropy or grants is effectively non-existent.

Leakage & Market Shifting

RATING AGENCY 'LEAKAGE BELT' CRITERIA

Could avoided harvest simply shift elsewhere, negating the climate benefit? Two structural controls prevent this:

Activity Shifting Blocked - Romanian Forestry Code (Law 46/2008) makes harvest quotas non-transferrable between properties. Silvador cannot legally compensate for reduced harvest in the project area by increasing extraction elsewhere.

Market Leakage Quantified - MARketz Tool analysis across 7 market factors yields 10% deduction, applied to all credits issued. Project represents only 0.1% of national timber supply.

Ongoing Monitoring - Annual verification of harvest volumes on Silvador's other 1,865 ha confirms no displacement. Market leakage recalculated at each verification.

Permanence & Buffer Pools

ICVCM CCP 3 • PERMANENCE

What if the carbon is released back to the atmosphere? A transparent risk assessment and mandatory buffer pool protect buyers:

Risk Quantified - AFOLU Non-Permanence Risk Tool v4.0 yields 11% total risk score: Internal 10 + External 0 + Natural 1. This percentage of all credits goes to Verra's global buffer pool.

Natural Risks Low — Romania's fire return interval is 200-300 years (only 0.042% of forests affected annually). Deciduous-dominated stands reduce pest vulnerability.

Clear Ownership - 100% freehold title held by Silvador Company SRL and Forest Capital SRL. Zero tenure disputes. Romania governance score: 0.24 (World Bank stable).

Double Counting Prevention

ICVCM CCP 6 • DOUBLE COUNTING

Could these carbon credits be counted twice? Multiple registry and disclosure controls prevent this:

Registry Exclusivity — Project registered solely under Verra VCS (ID 4511). VVB verified no registration with Gold Standard, Plan Vivo, ICR, or any other GHG program. Declaration letter on file.

Scope 3 Disclosure — Written notification sent to all timber buyers (6 companies) disclosing carbon claims. Public statement on Silvador website prevents downstream double-claiming.

No Stacking - Project has not received renewable energy certificates, EU ETS allowances, or any other form of GHG-related credit. Zero overlap with compliance markets.

Safeguards & Community

ICVCM CCP 4 • SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Does this project harm local communities or the environment? Three layers of independent verification confirm net positive impacts:

SD VISta Certified - Verra's Sustainable Development Verified Impact Standard confirms contributions to SDG 12 (Responsible Production), SDG 13 (Climate Action), and SDG 15 (Life on Land). Zero negative impacts identified

Stakeholder Engagement - 6 town hall meetings held (Nov 2022, Jan 2024), ~40 stakeholders consulted including local councils, forest workers, hunting associations, and NGOs. Zero grievances filed.

FSC Safeguards - 62% of project area FSC-certified (100% target). Principle 4 requires community benefits, worker rights, and conflict resolution mechanisms.

Baseline: Over-Crediting Risk

ICVCM CCP 1 • ROBUST QUANTIFICATION

Can the baseline be inflated? Three structural constraints prevent this:

Legal Cap — Harvest quotas fixed by 10-year Forest Management Plans under Romanian Forestry Code, enforced via SUMAL 2.0 digital tracking

Historical Anchor — 5+ years of verified harvest records (2012–2020) establish actual pre-project practice, not theoretical maximums

Model Calibration — CBM-CFS3 projections ground-truthed against 31 field plots; total uncertainty factor of 1.5% applied as credit deduction

Additionality: Financial & Legal

ICVCM CCP 2 • ADDITIONALITY

Would this conservation happen without carbon finance? No—and here's the verified proof:

Financial Test - 30-year NPV analysis: Baseline (harvesting) = €5.9M positive vs. Project (conservation) = -€252K. Conservation is financially unviable without VCU revenue.

Regulatory Surplus - Romanian Forestry Code (Law 46/2008) mandates harvesting under approved FMPs, not conservation. Ceasing harvest for 30 years goes far beyond legal requirements.

Common Practice - Only 2 IFM-LtPF projects exist in Romania. Private forest conservation without philanthropy or grants is effectively non-existent.

Leakage & Market Shifting

RATING AGENCY 'LEAKAGE BELT' CRITERIA

Could avoided harvest simply shift elsewhere, negating the climate benefit? Two structural controls prevent this:

Activity Shifting Blocked - Romanian Forestry Code (Law 46/2008) makes harvest quotas non-transferrable between properties. Silvador cannot legally compensate for reduced harvest in the project area by increasing extraction elsewhere.

Market Leakage Quantified - MARketz Tool analysis across 7 market factors yields 10% deduction, applied to all credits issued. Project represents only 0.1% of national timber supply.

Ongoing Monitoring - Annual verification of harvest volumes on Silvador's other 1,865 ha confirms no displacement. Market leakage recalculated at each verification.

Permanence & Buffer Pools

ICVCM CCP 3 • PERMANENCE

What if the carbon is released back to the atmosphere? A transparent risk assessment and mandatory buffer pool protect buyers:

Risk Quantified - AFOLU Non-Permanence Risk Tool v4.0 yields 11% total risk score: Internal 10 + External 0 + Natural 1. This percentage of all credits goes to Verra's global buffer pool.

Natural Risks Low — Romania's fire return interval is 200-300 years (only 0.042% of forests affected annually). Deciduous-dominated stands reduce pest vulnerability.

Clear Ownership - 100% freehold title held by Silvador Company SRL and Forest Capital SRL. Zero tenure disputes. Romania governance score: 0.24 (World Bank stable).

Double Counting Prevention

ICVCM CCP 6 • DOUBLE COUNTING

Could these carbon credits be counted twice? Multiple registry and disclosure controls prevent this:

Registry Exclusivity — Project registered solely under Verra VCS (ID 4511). VVB verified no registration with Gold Standard, Plan Vivo, ICR, or any other GHG program. Declaration letter on file.

Scope 3 Disclosure — Written notification sent to all timber buyers (6 companies) disclosing carbon claims. Public statement on Silvador website prevents downstream double-claiming.

No Stacking - Project has not received renewable energy certificates, EU ETS allowances, or any other form of GHG-related credit. Zero overlap with compliance markets.

Safeguards & Community

ICVCM CCP 4 • SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Does this project harm local communities or the environment? Three layers of independent verification confirm net positive impacts:

SD VISta Certified - Verra's Sustainable Development Verified Impact Standard confirms contributions to SDG 12 (Responsible Production), SDG 13 (Climate Action), and SDG 15 (Life on Land). Zero negative impacts identified

Stakeholder Engagement - 6 town hall meetings held (Nov 2022, Jan 2024), ~40 stakeholders consulted including local councils, forest workers, hunting associations, and NGOs. Zero grievances filed.

FSC Safeguards - 62% of project area FSC-certified (100% target). Principle 4 requires community benefits, worker rights, and conflict resolution mechanisms.

The questions serious buyers actually ask.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

All

Methodology

Legal

Risk

Due Diligence

Verification

METHODOLOGY

Why IFM-LtPF instead of REDD+ or ARR?

Because it matches what's actually happening: converting actively harvested private forest to protected forest.

METHODOLOGY

LEGAL

How was the baseline harvest level determined ?

From legally-binding 10-year Forest Management Plans (amenajamente silvice), not projections or estimates.

METHODOLOGY

LEGAL

Who audited this project and what exactly did they verify ?

EPIC Sustainability Services—an accredited VVB—conducted joint validation and verification with on-site inspection in January 2024.

RISK

What happens if there's fire on other reversal event ?

11% of all credits are held in Verra's global buffer pool, which covers reversals across all AFOLU projects—not just this one.

RISK

LEGAL

Why doesn't the project have a 100-year legal conservation comitment ?

Because it's a commercial forestry company making a 30-year business decision, not a land trust. The risk is already priced into the 11% buffer contribution.

LEGAL

METHODOLOGY

How does romanian foresty law strengthen project integrity ?

Mandatory harvest quotas, digital tracking (SUMAL 2.0), and severe penalties for illegal cutting create a uniquely robust regulatory environment.

DUE DILIGENCE

VERIFICATION

What documentation can i access for my own due diligence ?

Everything—VVB report, PD/MR, risk assessments, monitoring data, FSC audits, and calculation workbooks are publicly available or provided on request.

VERIFICATION

What's the verification schedule going forward?

At least every 5 years per VCS rules, with continuous monitoring in between.

All

Methodology

Legal

Risk

Due Diligence

Verification

METHODOLOGY

Why IFM-LtPF instead of REDD+ or ARR?

Because it matches what's actually happening: converting actively harvested private forest to protected forest.

METHODOLOGY

LEGAL

How was the baseline harvest level determined ?

From legally-binding 10-year Forest Management Plans (amenajamente silvice), not projections or estimates.

METHODOLOGY

LEGAL

Who audited this project and what exactly did they verify ?

EPIC Sustainability Services—an accredited VVB—conducted joint validation and verification with on-site inspection in January 2024.

RISK

What happens if there's fire on other reversal event ?

11% of all credits are held in Verra's global buffer pool, which covers reversals across all AFOLU projects—not just this one.

RISK

LEGAL

Why doesn't the project have a 100-year legal conservation comitment ?

Because it's a commercial forestry company making a 30-year business decision, not a land trust. The risk is already priced into the 11% buffer contribution.

LEGAL

METHODOLOGY

How does romanian foresty law strengthen project integrity ?

Mandatory harvest quotas, digital tracking (SUMAL 2.0), and severe penalties for illegal cutting create a uniquely robust regulatory environment.

DUE DILIGENCE

VERIFICATION

What documentation can i access for my own due diligence ?

Everything—VVB report, PD/MR, risk assessments, monitoring data, FSC audits, and calculation workbooks are publicly available or provided on request.

VERIFICATION

What's the verification schedule going forward?

At least every 5 years per VCS rules, with continuous monitoring in between.

All

Methodology

Legal

Risk

Due Diligence

Verification

METHODOLOGY

Why IFM-LtPF instead of REDD+ or ARR?

Because it matches what's actually happening: converting actively harvested private forest to protected forest.

METHODOLOGY

LEGAL

How was the baseline harvest level determined ?

From legally-binding 10-year Forest Management Plans (amenajamente silvice), not projections or estimates.

METHODOLOGY

LEGAL

Who audited this project and what exactly did they verify ?

EPIC Sustainability Services—an accredited VVB—conducted joint validation and verification with on-site inspection in January 2024.

RISK

What happens if there's fire on other reversal event ?

11% of all credits are held in Verra's global buffer pool, which covers reversals across all AFOLU projects—not just this one.

RISK

LEGAL

Why doesn't the project have a 100-year legal conservation comitment ?

Because it's a commercial forestry company making a 30-year business decision, not a land trust. The risk is already priced into the 11% buffer contribution.

LEGAL

METHODOLOGY

How does romanian foresty law strengthen project integrity ?

Mandatory harvest quotas, digital tracking (SUMAL 2.0), and severe penalties for illegal cutting create a uniquely robust regulatory environment.

DUE DILIGENCE

VERIFICATION

What documentation can i access for my own due diligence ?

Everything—VVB report, PD/MR, risk assessments, monitoring data, FSC audits, and calculation workbooks are publicly available or provided on request.

VERIFICATION

What's the verification schedule going forward?

At least every 5 years per VCS rules, with continuous monitoring in between.

Empower your sustainability goals

Make your climate impact real. Buy verified carbon removals now.

Woman In The Water
Woman In The Water
Car
Car
Spary Bottle
Spary Bottle
Woman In The Glass Way
Woman In The Glass Way
Blue Space
Blue Space
Tall trees with yellow and green leaves stand in a forest on a sunny day. The ground is covered in fallen leaves.
Tall trees with yellow and green leaves stand in a forest on a sunny day. The ground is covered in fallen leaves.
WIne Bottle
WIne Bottle

Empower your sustainability goals

Make your climate impact real. Buy verified carbon removals now.

Woman In The Water
Woman In The Water
Car
Car
Spary Bottle
Spary Bottle
Woman In The Glass Way
Woman In The Glass Way
Blue Space
Blue Space
Tall trees with yellow and green leaves stand in a forest on a sunny day. The ground is covered in fallen leaves.
Tall trees with yellow and green leaves stand in a forest on a sunny day. The ground is covered in fallen leaves.
WIne Bottle
WIne Bottle

Empower your sustainability goals

Make your climate impact real. Buy verified carbon removals now.

Woman In The Water
Woman In The Water
Car
Car
Spary Bottle
Spary Bottle
Woman In The Glass Way
Woman In The Glass Way
Blue Space
Blue Space
Tall trees with yellow and green leaves stand in a forest on a sunny day. The ground is covered in fallen leaves.
Tall trees with yellow and green leaves stand in a forest on a sunny day. The ground is covered in fallen leaves.
WIne Bottle
WIne Bottle

Get in touch

SILVADOR

©2025

Get in touch

SILVADOR

©2025

Get in touch

SILVADOR

©2025

Contact Now

Get in touch

Get in touch

Get in touch

Let’s create something amazing together! Reach out I’d love to hear about your project and ideas.

Let’s create something amazing together! Reach out I’d love to hear about your project and ideas.

Let’s create something amazing together! Reach out I’d love to hear about your project and ideas.

24/7 Full Time Support

24/7 Full Time Support

24/7 Full Time Support

Available Worldwide

Available Worldwide

Available Worldwide